Audit clients with presence in China and Malaysia

Some of our audit clients may have subsidiaries in overseas, e.g. China and Malaysia.

If your audit clients have presence in China and Malaysia, pelase take note that there is a increase in minium wages in certain provinces of China and the entire Malaysia. The minium wages differ among differnt provinces in China. It is important for you as auditor to find out the actual minimum wages rate for the particular regions where you audit client has presence. For Malaysia, the minium wages has increased to RM 900.

It is important to form an expectation that the salary costs are expected to increase in FY 2012, if your audit clients have presence in the countries mentioned above.

Disclosure of the source of deferred tax assets and liabilities

Our audit client may have recorded deferred tax assets and liabilities on its balance sheet/ statement of financial position. Deferred tax is essentially the tax impact arising from the temporary difference between the Company's accounting and tax carrying value. For instance, the net book value of a property-plant and equipments are usually different between accounting book and tax book. This could be because the depreciation policy for accounting book ( i.e. set by the Company) and tax book (i.e. set by the authority) is different.

In reviewing the financial statement of our audit clients, who has recorded the deferred tax, we need to ensure that the Company has disclosed the source of the deferred tax assets / liabilities. This helps the financial statement users to understand the nature of the deferred tax assets / liabilities.

Generally, deferred tax assets are mainly attributable to:
- recognition of unutilised tax losses
- recognition of unabsorbed capital allowance
- differences on depreciation

Whereas, deferred tax liabilities are attributable to:
- differences on depreciation
- differences on provision

By disclosing the source of deferred taxes, the financial statement users can understand the balance sheet, as well as the tax expense of the Company.

Provision for restoration cost/ provision for reinstatement cost

When an audit client signed an rental / lease agreement to lease a space (i.e. office / warehouse), please make sure that we, as an auditor, we review the agreement thoroughly.

Generally, audit client has to reinstate/ restore the lease space to its original state. To illustrate, audit client may have renovated the building for its own purpose. The owner would request the audit client to reinstate the lease space to its original state when the lease expire and the audit client decided not to renew the lease agreement.

A provision for instatement cost / restoration cost need to be recorded, as it is an existing obligation of the audit client. This amount relates to the cost to be incurred to reinstate the lease space back to its original state. This amount can be estimated by obtaining quotation from the renovator / building contractor.

The accounting entries are:
Dr. Fixed asset- reinstatement cost
Cr. Accrual

The amount capitalised above relates to the full cost to be incurred when the lease expire ( note: assume the inflationary adjustment to be not material. On an annual basis, the following entry need to be recorded:

Dr. Reinstatement cost- P&L
Cr. Accum Dep- Fixed asset- reinstatement cost
This amonut is computed based on the amount capitalised divided by remaining lease period.

The depreciation entry is to record the cost capitalised into P&L on a straight line basis.

Using the work of an expert

In audit, it is not uncommon for management to rely on the work's of expert to assist in preparing the financial statement of the Company. The common work of experts relied by management are as follows:

- engaging external valuer to perform valuation of property ( for impairment assessment of the property)
- engaging corporate finance expert to assist in Purchase Price Allocation review
- engaging actuary to estimate the defined benefit plan of the Company
- engaging corporate finance expert to assist in impairment assessment of goodwill / brand / etc

Generally, management relied on the subject matter expert to provide their opinion on certain aspects.What did we do as an auditor to address this matter?

International Standard of Auditing specifically mention that we need to review and/or evaluate the independence, competency and objectivity of these experts. It is important for us to carry a rigid assessment on the external valuer and its work to ensure that the results is not unreasonable. For instance, we need to check that the valuer is independent from management, such that the opinion provided by expert is independent and not under the influence of management.

When the work performed by subject matter expert become very technical, we may consider to consult our in-house expert (e.g. transaction service department/ valuation team). This is to check that the methodology / work performed by subject matter expert is not unreasonable. The opinion provided by subject matter expert could affect our audit opinion directly. Hence, we urge all auditors to ensure that all mandatory procedures are performed and all factors are consider to deal with this.